2527NSC Aviation Research Methods Written Assignment 2

Looking  for 2527NSC Aviation Research Methods Written Assignment Answers? Improve your academic grade with Case Study Help. World’s No.1 Assignment Answers Provide on custom research papers writing service, Thesis Paper Writing in Australia, UK, USA, Singapore and Many Countries at students friendly price.

 

I have chosen the topic Air traffic accidents and have attached the two research papers. They are Cabin Safety and emergency Evacuation and Survivability of Occupants in commercial passenger aircraft accidents.

Written Assignment Details:

Document Type :: Essay (any type)

Subject :: Other

Deadline :*: As Per Required

Number of Words :: As Per Required

Citation/Referencing Style :: APA

 

Marking Criteria for 2527NSC – Written Assignment 1: Critical Analysis

1. Content (50%)

• Is the introduction engaging and clear?
• Does it restate the importance of the thesis?
• Is there a deep or meaningful analysis of text? (Writer’s point of view is apparent)
• Is there evidence to support argument/analysis?
• Are there connections between the text and the analysis?
• Is the analysis/argument clear and consistent?
• Is the conclusion clear?

 

High Distinction 5

• Well-developed introduction that grabs readers’ attention & engages the readers
• Thesis statement clearly states the experience or event that will be described as well as the effect on the writer.
• Main points/topic sentences are well developed and relate directly to the thesis.
• The analysis is developed with a clear and strong point of view.
• Supporting examples are logical and detailed.
• The conclusion is clear, and effectively wraps up and re-stresses the importance of the thesis.

 

Distinction 4

• Introduction creates interest.
• The thesis states the position.
• Main points related to the thesis, but some may lack details.
• Analysis shows events from the author’s point of view but is not always consistent.
• Supporting examples are logical but missing some details
• Conclusion clearly summarises the topic.

 

Credit 3

• Introduction adequately explains the background but may lack details.
• The thesis states the topic, but the key elements are missing or unclear.
• Main points are present but lack details in describing the event.
• Analysis shows events from the author’s point of view but is not consistent.
• Supporting examples are sometimes unclear or not logical and missing some details.
• The conclusion summarises the topic but does not restate the importance of the thesis.

 

Pass 2

• The introduction is vague and unclear.
• Thesis somehow states the topic, but the key elements are missing or unclear.
• Ideas/main points are not explained adequately and/or are poorly developed.
• Little analysis is provided, or analysis is very unclear and does not show the author’s point of view.
• Background details are random, unclear collection of information
• The conclusion is not clear and does not summarise the main points.

 

Fail 1-0

• No introduction is provided
• The thesis does not state the topic.
• Ideas/main points are missing or unexplained.
• No analysis is provided, or analysis is random, unclear, and show no attempt at expressing the author’s point of view.
• Background details are random, unclear collection of information
• The conclusion is unclear or missing

 

2. Organisation (20%)

• Is the paper organised in an understandable order? (Introduction, Discussion, Conclusion?)
• Does the paper follow formatting rules? (12 pt. font, Times New Roman)
• Are there logical transitions between ideas and paragraphs that enhance the analysis/argument?
• Is this paper meeting the word count?

 

High Distinction 5

• A clear progression from the thesis, main points/analysis, and conclusion.
• Paper follows all formatting rules
• Connections between paragraphs are clear and logical.
• Word count met and stated.

 

Distinction 4

• Thesis, main points/analysis, and conclusion are present
• Paper follows the formatting rules, only a few minor formatting errors.
• Connections between paragraphs are present but sometimes are not clear or logical.
• Word count is stated, but slightly above/below the limit.

 

Credit 3

• Thesis, main points/analysis, and conclusion are present but not clear.
• Some formatting errors.
• Connections between paragraphs are not always clear or logical.
• Word count is stated, but it is significantly above/below the limit (+/- 200 words).

 

Pass 2

• Thesis, main points/analysis, or conclusion are missing
• Multiple formatting errors.
• Connections between paragraphs are consistently unclear or not logical.
• Word count is not stated or is way below/above the limit (+/- 300 words).

 

Fail 1-0

• No order with thesis, main points/analysis, or conclusion.
• Paper does not follow formatting rules. Formatting errors are distracting the reader.
• Little or no connections made between paragraphs.
• Word count is not stated or is extremely below/above the limit (+/- 400 words).

 

3. Language (20%)

• Is the paper easy to read and understand?
• Is the paper cohesive?
• Are grammar and vocabulary appropriate?
• Does the paper have any grammatical or spelling mistakes?

 

High Distinction 5

• Writing is smooth, skilful, and coherent. Paragraphs move smoothly with little or no awkward transitions.
• Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure.
• Voice is consistent, and words are well chosen.
•  Punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation are all correct.

 

Distinction 4

• Writing is clear, and sentences have varied structure. Diction is consistent.
• Sentences are mostly expressive and well-written.
• Language is comprehensive and clear.
• Punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation are generally correct with few errors (1- 2)

 

Credit 3

• Writing is clear but could use a little more sentence variety to make the writing more interesting.
• Some sentences are fragmented.
• Little descriptive language is used.
• There are only a few (3-4) errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.

 

Pass 2

• Writing is somehow confusing and, in some instances, hard to follow.
• Contains many sentence fragments and/or run-on sentences
• Language is hard to understand.
• Distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.

 

Fail 1-0

• Writing is confusing and hard to follow
• Consistent sentence fragments and run-on sentences.
• Language is hard to understand or incoherent.
• Consistent and many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.

 

4. References (10%)

• Is this paper using the APA6 referencing style, with consistent in-text and list referencing?
• Is the reference list complete and with no errors?
• Is there more than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report?

 

High Distinction 5

• References and citation style (APA 6) were correct and consistent between the list and the text.
• Reference list utterly concise without errors.
• Less than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.

 

Distinction 4

• References and citation style (APA 6) were correct and consistent between the list and the text.
• Reference list with only a few minor mistakes (1-2).
• Less than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.

 

Credit 3

• Most of the references and citation style (APA 6) were consistent between the list and the text.
• Reference list with some mistakes (3-4).
•  More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.

 

Pass 2

• Some references and citation style (APA 6) were inconsistent between the list and the text.
• Reference list has more than some mistakes (5-6).
• More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.

 

Fail 1-0

• Many references and citation style (APA 6) were inconsistent between the text and the list.
• A high number of mistakes in the reference list (6+).
• More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.

 

 

Reference ID: #getanswers2001177