Submit Your Question

Answering Assignment Homework Questions

High Quality, Fast Delivery, Plagiarism Free - Just in 3 Steps

Upload Questions Details and Instructions:


Select Assignment Files

Get Assignment Help by Experts


Plagiarism-Free, Every Time

All of our assignment solution delivers with a dedicated plagiarism report

Excellent Subject Matter Expert

Get Supreme Assignment Help by highly Skilled Writers

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed

Score Higher or Your Money Back

Case Study Help reviews

SEN728 Transportation Infrastructure Systems Assignment Answers

Assignment Solutions on SEN728 Transportation Infrastructure Systems

Are you looking for SEN728 Transportation Infrastructure Systems Assignment Answers? The path to achieving an A+ grade is through Casestudyhelp.com only. We are here in your service by providing you with Management Assignment Help. You can try out our website to enjoy the unique assignment help services backed by stupendous writers. Our academic assignment help is all about accurate and original content. We have a group of 3000+ PhD level assignment expert writers who provide qualitative online assignment help to students from the UK, US and Australia.

order-now

Introduction

As a widespread began by the transport coordination, traffic congestion is deteriorating in most metropolitan areas, in specific megacities. For instance, Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics assessments the ‘avoidable’ charge of overcrowding for Australian resources were about $9.4 billion in 2005, which is included of $3.6 billion in corporate time expenditures, $3.5 billion in reserved time expenses, $1.2 billion in additional automobile functioning charges, and $1.1 billion in additional air contamination prices[1]. It was also discovered by scholars that there are some important connections between contaminants from traffic congestion and opposing confinement results, dieses like breast cancer[2]

In the transportation system, congestion charging is measured as slow that be able to be used effectively to shrink overcrowding and its interrelated harms [3]. Enactment of a congestion pricing pattern in Milan, Stockholm, and London, confirmations likely consequences. Respectively, 14.2%, 18%, and 18% decline in track arriving the crowding zone was evaluated during charging periods[4].

Examples of Congestion Charging Schemes around the World

In central London in the early 1970s Congestion charge was first studied and did not get considerably responsiveness for the reason that of the substantial spare ability on public transportation at that period. After that in 2003, the cordon pricing system was implemented and its function by using automatic number plate identification in an 8 mi2 area (21 km2 zone). Automobiles are recorded robotically by cameras that photo the number of plates. The arrangement contains overhead supports, cameras at all arrival points, highway signage, and roadway markings. Payment can be done by text message, by post, online, registering auto-pay system, or via telephone, of £11.50 as Flat daily fees. The timing of charging is Monday to Friday, in between to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and on day of weekends and holiday and also Christmas to New year, and during night timing there are no charges. It’s Annual Net Revenue is approx. £137 million/year[5].

In Stockholm, after the successful trial in 2006, the scheme was propelled in 2007. The cordon pricing system was implemented and its function by using automatic number plate identification in a 13 mi2 area (35 km2 zone). Automobiles are recorded robotically by cameras that photo the number of plates. The arrangement contains overhead supports, cameras at all arrival points, highway signage, and roadway markings. Charged was flexible concerning the time of the day and the maximum peak period cost is 35 Krona per usage. The monthly total charged invoice is sent to the vehicle owner and can pay by online, mail, and debit from a bank account. The timing of the charge is 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., from Monday to Friday. On weekends, public holidays or the day before public holidays, and during nights (6:30 pm – 06:29 am), nor during July, no charge was collected. It’s Annual Net Revenue is approx. 1.3 billion kronor/year[5]

In Singapore, the ERP (electronic road pricing) was propelled by replacing the cordon pricing scheme that was applied in 1975. The (ERP) conspire is completely programmed on explicit routes, fixed time interval, and bearings, with variable valuing intended to react to clog progressively. Automobiles are needed to have an in-vehicle unit on the dashboard and a shrewd card with admission put away on it. Overhead supports recognize the sort of vehicle, the blockage of the routes at explicit occasions, and deduct the variable charge from the smart card. Payment is collected from $0 -$4.00 on a per-pass basis at over 50 points within and close to the CBD (central business district) and fees charge vary depend on different roads and time phases contingent on confined traffic situations and also in-vehicle unit prices $150.00. timing for this system is 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., from Monday to Saturday and on public holidays, Sunday or after 1 pm the day before a public holiday no charge is carried out. Its Annual Net Revenue is $150 million/year[5].

Benefits of Congestion Charging

Moreover, concentrated traffic overcrowding, profits causing from executing a congestion charge structure contain income growth, better transportation amenity, transportation ridership rise, travel time investments because of the better traffic circumstances, and other resulting welfares on community strength and situation. Generally, the benefits of applying a congestion pricing system are mostly described to balance the connected costs such as the operation and initial costs[6].

The benefits of congestion charging are:

Empowering the utilization of open transportation: More workers utilizing open transportation implies more income will be created to be put resources into the open transportation framework. Furthermore, the assets gathered from the clog charge can likewise be added to open transportation activities.

Diminishing travel time and improving profitability: Traffic is costly since laborers lose important time driving.

Lessening contamination: Fewer vehicles implies less contamination. Dirtied air presents genuine wellbeing concerns, expanding demise rates just as medical services costs. For urban areas handling air contamination, blockage charges can hold the way to improved air quality.

Empowering transport advancement: Solutions, for example, micro versatility and self-driving electric vehicles, will turn out to be additionally engaging as driving customary vehicles to turn out to be costlier.

Lessening open spending on the street foundation: Fewer drivers out and about will bring down the interest for street subsidizing, as there will be less mileage. It will likewise lessen the requirement for new streets and roadways, opening up financing for different projects.

Bringing down street related passing: Road mishaps are normally diminished with fewer drivers out and about.

Expanding personal satisfaction: Less traffic, less contamination, and better open transportation all assistance to build personal satisfaction for the inhabitants of the charging zone.

Drawbacks of Congestion Charging

Expanding social disparity: A level expense clog charge excessively influences less fortunate individuals who can’t stand to pay the charge. The individuals who can bear the cost of the charges will profit by emptier streets and quicker travel times.

Lacking open transportation: The open transportation framework will most likely be unable to deal with an uncommon increment in the volume of travelers. Besides, numerous urban communities don’t have an adequately evolved open transportation framework. Urban communities may need to assemble extra framework to abstain from congestion and guarantee open transportation gives an appropriate option in contrast to vehicles.

Executing and keeping up the framework: A clog charge plot requires financing and cutting edge innovation to work viably.

Avoidance: general society might be hesitant to make good on extra duties, prompting avoidance of the clog charge and criminal or unlawful action.

Recommendations for Melbourne

The two chief tasks for executing congestion charge are political and community, consent facilities rather than organizational or technical concerns. Without either powerful public support or strong political support, the congestion price basically cannot be executed in most states with a self-governing politically aware system, which is definite by the unsuccessful efforts in numerous cities such as Edinburgh, New York City, and Manchester[7]. The real applications of congestion-charged are mainly controlled, owing to the short community receipt level. Established on a pitch review, this training exposes the community receipt level in Melbourne, Australia. It was start that the close of receipt for a new congestion-pricing system is approx. 42%, which static wishes to be improved if a congestion-pricing scheme is to be implemented. Some strategies are proposed and discussed to increase the acceptance level towards congestion charge in urban cities, including a data operation, public carriage advances and a trial [8].

Following factor to be through implementing the congestion charge system:

  • Factor of fairness

The value matter illustrations when there is a dispersion of costs just as different socio segment gatherings. Various occasions, individuals with versatility weakness and low-salary drivers were the most influenced with serious voyaging trouble when clog valuing is presented, as they have less travel decisions. This is the situation as “poor people” are hampered with additional fields, henceforth restricting them from utilizing street foundation when contrasted with their rich partners. Additionally, when an estimating plan is introduced, numerous worries about its decency are raised by residents living both inside and outside the charging zone. This, along these lines, suggests that the general population must know about the way that the clog valuing plan presentation is a stage forward in making an evenhanded utilization of the vehicle framework

  • Increasing of Risk

Vulnerability is among the significant reasons that influence the presentation of new strategies, and clog evaluating isn’t a special case. Ingberman contends that the primary explanation behind vulnerability prompts the absence of help while presenting blockage evaluating plans the same number of citizens are probably going to keep keeping up the norm when new plans are being presented without legitimate preliminaries.

  • Personal Privacy

privacy matter was first discussed during the system test that was caused in the offer refusal in the upcoming survey. Different gatherings of heads were worried about the intrusion of clients’ protection. During the usage of clog valuing in London and ERP presentation in Singapore, the security issue was completely tended to. Singapore’s ERP keen card doesn’t store private subtleties for the two drivers and vehicles. Consequently, private data of workers won’t be recorded at different executing focuses. To make trust and empower open acknowledgment, the vehicle partners are commanded to make sure about the security of shrewd cardholders.

References

BTRE 2007 Transport Colloquium—Australian Transport and the Challenge.

Janet Currie; Reed Walker, Traffic Congestion and Infant Health: Evidence from E-ZPass, 2011, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL: APPLIED ECONOMICS, VOL. 3, NO. 1, JANUARY 2011

Wang, Y.; Peng, Z.; Wang, K.; Song, X.; Yao, B.; Feng, T. Research on Urban Road Congestion Pricing Strategy Considering Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Sustainability 2015, 7, 10534–10553.

Li, Z.; Hensher, D.A. Congestion charging and car use: A review of stated preference and opinion studies and market monitoring evidence. Transp. Policy 2012, 20, 47–61.

Road Pricing in London, Stockholm, and Singapore a way forward for New York City, tristate transportation campaign)

Leape, Jonathan. “The London Congestion Charge.”, 2006, Journal of Economic Perspective, 20 (4): 157-176.DOI: 10.1257/jep.20.4.157

Bjorn Hårsman, John M. Quigley, Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: Ideology and self‐interest, 2010, Journal of Policy Analysis and management.

Liu, Z., Shiwakoti, N., & Bie, Y., Measuring the public acceptance of urban congestion-pricing: a survey in Melbourne (Australia), 2018, Transport, 33(4), 902-912.

Aya Selmoune, Qixiu Cheng, Lumeng Wang, Zhiyuan Liu, “Influencing Factors in Congestion Pricing Acceptability: A Literature Review”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, Article ID 4242964.

Get This Answer with Case Study Help-24/7 Q&A Help

We're here to instantly help! Get best assignment questions and answers help 24/7 and Earn better grades with homework

PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE

Top