Submit Your Question

Answering Assignment Homework Questions

High Quality, Fast Delivery, Plagiarism Free - Just in 3 Steps

Upload Questions Details and Instructions:


Select Assignment Files

24/7 ASSIGNMENT ANSWER



Plagiarism-Free Answers

Assignment solution along with originality report.

Answers From Qualified Tutors

Get assignment answer help by skilled & qualified tutors.

Best Price Guarantee

Friendly pricing & refund policy.

Case Study Help reviews

Strategic Facilities Management Assignment Solution

Stuck with a Strategic Facilities Management Assignment Solution? Casestudyhelp.com is students’ most trusted assignment writing help. They cover all kinds of assignments, including Strategic Management, Management, and Business Management. Our expert assignment writer’s offer 24/7 live chat support with AI-free and customized assignment help at a reasonable price for students.

Order Now

QUESTION 1 (INDIVIDUAL REPORT)

The individual report must consist of the following:

  1. Introduction
    1. Background of healthcare facilities and importance of Facility Management (FM).
    2. Purpose of the
  • Scope and
  1. Structure of the
  1. Stakeholder Needs Analysis
    1. Identification of key stakeholders: patients, staff, management, regulators, and
    2. Needs and expectations of each stakeholder
  • Alignment of FM strategies with stakeholder
  1. Current Challenges in Healthcare Facility Management
    1. Safety and compliance
    2. Maintenance and asset management
  • Space utilisation and workflow
  1. Technology integration and digital healthcare
  2. Sustainability and environmental
  1. Strategic Facility Management Blueprint
    1. Maintenance Strategy (preventive, predictive, corrective approaches).
    2. Space Utilisation Plan (efficient layout, flexible design, patient flow).
  • Safety and Compliance Strategy (OSH, fire safety, infection control, accreditation).
  1. Technology Integration (IoT, smart systems, digital monitoring, patient-centred technology).
  2. Sustainability Plan (energy efficiency, waste management, green building standards).
  1. Stakeholder Satisfaction Plan
    1. Framework for ensuring patient safety, comfort, and
    2. Strategies to enhance staff productivity and workplace
  • Management expectations: cost efficiency, long-term asset
  1. Community and regulatory
  1. Implementation Roadmap
    1. Phased implementation (short-term, medium-term, long-term).
    2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for monitoring
  • Risk management
  1. Continuous improvement
  1. Conclusion
    1. Summary of
    2. Strategic implications of the FM
  • Recommendations for ensuring sustainable healthcare facility
  1. References
  2. Academic and industry sources (APA style).

ATTACHMENT

QIESTION 1: INDIVIDUAL REPORT WRITING RUBRIC (CLO 2)

*QN/

*NS

 

CLO

Criteria/ Kriteria Weight/ Pemberat Excellent/

Cemerlang

Good/

Baik

Fair/

Sederhana

Poor/

Lemah

Unsatisfactory/

Tidak memuaskan

Max Marks
4 3 2 1 0
 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

 

2

Report Structure & Clarity.  

 

 

 

1

Clear, logical, professional structure; excellent

flow.

Well-structured, minor gaps. Adequate structure, some confusion. Poorly structured, lacks clarity. Unstructured, unclear.  

 

 

 

4

Struktur dan Kejelasan Laporan. Struktur yang jelas, logik, profesional; aliran yang sangat

baik.

Berstruktur dengan baik, jurang kecil. Struktur yang mencukupi, sedikit kekeliruan. Tidak tersusun dengan baik, kurang kejelasan. Tidak berstruktur, tidak jelas.
 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

2

Stakeholder Needs Analysis.  

 

 

1

Comprehensive, insightful, covers all

stakeholders.

Covers most stakeholders, good

analysis

Partial coverage, some missing depth. Limited analysis, superficial. Absent or irrelevant.  

 

 

4

Analisis Keperluan Pihak Berkepentingan. Komprehensif, bernas, meliputi semua pihak

berkepentingan.

Meliputi kebanyakan pihak berkepentingan,

analisis yang baik.

Liputan separa, beberapa kedalaman hilang. Analisis yang terhad, dangkal. Tiada atau tidak relevan.
 

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

 

2

Challenges Identification.  

 

 

 

1

Clearly identifies and analyses key healthcare FM

challenges.

Identifies most relevant challenges. Some challenges identified, shallow analysis. Limited or vague identification. No challenges discussed.  

 

 

 

4

Pengenalpastian Cabaran. Mengenal pasti dan menganalisis cabaran utama FM penjagaan kesihatan dengan

jelas.

Mengenal pasti cabaran yang paling relevan. Beberapa cabaran dikenal pasti, analisis cetek.  

Pengenalan terhad atau tidak jelas

 

Tiada cabaran dibincangkan.

 

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

 

2

FM Strategic Blueprint.  

 

 

 

1

Innovative, practical, integrates safety, space, maintenance,

tech & sustainability.

Covers most FM aspects with good detail. Adequate but lacks innovation or depth. Limited, missing key FM components. No blueprint provided.  

 

 

 

4

Rangka Tindakan Strategik FM. Inovatif, praktikal, mengintegrasikan keselamatan, ruang, penyelenggaraan, teknologi &

kemampanan.

Merangkumi kebanyakan aspek FM dengan perincian yang baik. Mencukupi tetapi tidak mempunyai inovasi atau kedalaman.  

Terhad, tiada komponen utama FM.

 

Tiada blueprint disediakan.

 

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

 

2

Stakeholder Satisfaction Plan.  

 

 

 

1

Comprehensive, evidence-based, ensures measurable

satisfaction.

Good plan, minor gaps. Adequate but lacks depth in execution. Limited or vague plan.  

No plan provided.

 

 

 

 

 

4

Pelan Kepuasan Pihak Berkepentingan. Komprehensif, berasaskan bukti, memastikan kepuasan yang boleh

diukur.

 

Pelan yang baik, jurang kecil.

 

Mencukupi tetapi kurang mendalam dalam pelaksanaan.

 

Pelan terhad atau tidak jelas.

 

Tiada pelan disediakan.

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

2

Implementation Roadmap (KPIs & Risk Mgmt.).  

 

 

1

Clear phased roadmap, measurable KPIs,

strong risk plan.

Good roadmap, some KPIs identified. Basic roadmap, limited measurability. Minimal roadmap, vague.  

No roadmap.

 

 

 

4

Pelan Hala Tuju Pelaksanaan (KPI & Mgmt. Risiko). Pelan hala tuju yang jelas, KPI boleh diukur, pelan risiko

yang kukuh.

Pelan hala tuju yang baik, beberapa KPI dikenal pasti. Pelan hala tuju asas, kebolehukur terhad. Pelan jalan yang minimum, kabur. Tiada pelan hala tuju.
 

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

 

2

Critical Thinking & Problem Solving.  

 

 

 

1

Demonstrates excellent evidence- based reasoning &

creativity.

Good reasoning, mostly evidence- based. Moderate reasoning, limited evidence. Minimal critical thinking.  

Absent.

 

 

 

 

4

Pemikiran Kritis & Penyelesaian Masalah. Menunjukkan pertimbangan berasaskan bukti dan kreativiti yang

sangat baik.

Pertimbangan yang baik, kebanyakannya berasaskan bukti. Pertimbangan yang sederhana, bukti terhad.  

Minimum pemikiran kritis.

 

 

Tiada.

 

 

 

Q1

 

 

 

2

Presentation & Referencing.  

 

 

 

0.5

Professional presentation, error- free, proper APA

references.

Good formatting, few errors. Acceptable but inconsistent referencing. Poor formatting & referencing. Not referenced or plagiarised.  

 

 

 

2

Pembentangan dan Rujukan. Penyampaian profesional, bebas ralat, rujukan APA

yang betul.

Pemformatan yang baik, sedikit ralat. Rujukan yang boleh diterima tetapi tidak konsisten. Pemformatan dan rujukan yang lemah. Tidak dirujuk atau diciplak.
Total 7.5   30

QUESTION 2: VIDEO PRESENTATION RUBRIC (CLO 3)

 

Component

 

Sub Criteria

 

Weight

Excellent Above average Fair Low   Max Marks
4 3 2 1 0
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMUNICATION SKILLS. (CLO 3)

 

KEMAHIRAN KOMUNIKASI.

 

 

 

 

 

Describing Idea.

Menggambarkan Idea.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Clearly describes of the ideas that cover analysis, discussion and proposal of the organisation facilities improvements.

Huraian yang jelas menggambarkan idea-idea yang meliputi analisis, perbincangan dan cadangan penambahbaikan kemudahan

organisasi.

Good description of the ideas that cover analysis, discussion and proposal of the organization facilities improvements.

 

Huraian yang baik tentang idea-idea yang meliputi analisis, perbincangan dan cadangan penambahbaikan kemudahan organisasi.

 

 

 

 

Describes the ideas but mumbles.

Menggambarkan idea-idea tetapi menggumam.

 

 

 

 

Fails to describe the ideas fully.

Gagal menerangkan idea-idea sepenuhnya.

 

 

 

 

 

Does not meet the requirements.

Tidak memenuhi keperluan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Delivering Sentence.

 

 

 

1

The delivery is engaging and sentence structure is consistently correct. The delivery and sentence structure are generally correct. The delivery and sentence structure are moderately correct.  

Fails to deliver correctly.

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 

 

 

4

  Menyampaikan

Ayat.

  Penyampaian yang

menarik dan struktur ayat yang

konsistennya betul.

Penyampaian dan

struktur ayat secara umumnya betul.

Penyampaian dan struktur ayat yang sederhana betul. Gagal menyampaikan

dengan betul.

Tidak memenuhi

keperluan.

 
   

 

Eye Contact.

  Eye contact is made and sustained throughout the

presentation.

Concern of eye contact with the

audiences.

Eye contact to audience can be

improved.

Eye contact to audience was not

consistent.

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 
    0.5           2
Hubungan mata.   Hubungan mata

dibuat dan dikekalkan sepanjang

persembahan.

Kebimbangan

hubungan mata dengan penonton.

Hubungan mata

kepada penonton boleh diperbaiki.

Hubungan mata

kepada penonton tidak konsisten.

Tidak memenuhi

keperluan.

 
 

 

Confidence.

 

Keyakinan.

 

 

 

0.5

 

Presentation is full with confidence.

 

Pembentangan penuh dengan keyakinan.

The confidence level sometime gone wobbly/unstable/sha ky.

 

Tahap keyakinan kadang-kadang menjadi goyah / tidak

stabil / goyah.

 

 

Lack of confidence.

 

Kurang keyakinan.

 

 

No confidence.

 

Tiada keyakinan.

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 

Tidak memenuhi keperluan.

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Body language.

 

Bahasa badan.

 

 

 

 

0.5

Excellent uses of body postures and movements, smooth and convincing.

 

Kegunaan posture tubuh yang baik dan pergerakan, lancar dan meyakinkan.

Good uses of body postures and movements, discontinue a little bit.

Kegunaan postur badan yang baik dan pergerakan, memberhentikan

sedikit.

Suitable uses of body postures and movements, shaky all the time.

 

Penggunaan posture badan yang sesuai dan pergerakan, goyah sepanjang masa.

Bad uses of body postures and movements, inert and boring.

 

Penggunaan yang postur badan tidak sesuai dan gerakan, lengai dan membosankan.

 

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 

Tidak memenuhi keperluan.

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

LEADERSHIP AND TEAMWORK SKILLS. (CLO 3)

 

KEMAHIRAN KEPIMPINAN DAN KERJA BERPASUKAN.

 

Group Coorperation.

 

Kerjasama Kumpulan.

 

 

 

1

High level of cooperation between all members of group.

Tahap kerjasama yang tinggi antara

semua ahli kumpulan.

 

All members of group cooperate.

 

Semua ahli kumpulan berkerjasama.

Some members of group cooperate.

 

Sesetengah alhi kumpulan berkerjasama.

 

Members work in isolation.

 

Ahli bekerja secara berasingan.

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 

Tidak memenuhi keperluan.

 

 

 

4

 

 

Decision Responsibility.

 

Tanggungjawab Keputusan.

 

 

 

 

0.5

All members shared responsibility for group decission.

Semua ahli kumpulan berkongsi tanggungjawab untuk membuat keputusan.

Responsibility for task is shared by group.

Tanggungjawab untuk tugasan dikongsi oleh kumpulan.

Responsibility for group decissions is not always shared by group.

Tanggungjawab untuk keputusan kumpulan tidak selalu dikongsi oleh

kumpulan.

Responsibility for group decissions is shirked (to avoid).

Tanggungjawab untuk keputusan kumpulan ‘shirked’ (untuk mengelakkan).

 

 

Does not meet the requirements.

 

Tidak memenuhi keperluan.

 

 

 

 

2

Total   5   20

QUESTION 3: ONLINE DISCUSSION RUBRIC (CLO 2)

 

 

 

Criteria/Kriteria

 

 

 

Weight/ Pemberat

 

 

Excellent/Cemerlang

 

 

Good/Baik

 

 

Fair/Sederhana

 

 

Poor/Lemah

Unsatisfactory/ Tidak memuaskan Or/atau

No response/ Tiada

respons

 

 

Max Marks

4 3 2 1 0
Discussion on the case study and delegation of task. (CLO 2)  

 

 

 

0.5

Excellence participation in discussion of the case study and delegation of

tasks.

Good participation in discussion of the case study and delegation of

tasks.

Moderate participation in discussion of the case study and delegation of

tasks.

Less participation in discussion of the case study and delegation of

tasks.

No posting of discussion.  

 

 

 

2

Perbincangan mengenai kajian kes dan delegasi tugas. Penyertaan yang cemerlang dalam perbincangan kajian kes dan delegasi tugas. Penyertaan yang baik dalam perbincangan kajian kes dan delegasi tugas. Penyertaan yang sederhana dalam perbincangan mengenai kajian kes dan delegasi

tugas.

Kurang penyertaan dalam perbincangan mengenai kajian kes dan perwakilan tugas.  

Tiada posting perbincangan.

Discussion among group members and e-tutor on the secondary data and information collected. (CLO 2)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Excellence participation in discussion of secondary data with the team members and e- tutors. Good participation in discussion of secondary data with the team members and e-tutors. Moderate participation in discussion of secondary data with the team members and e- tutors.  

Less participation in discussion of secondary data with the team members and e-tutors.

 

 

No posting of discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

Perbincangan di kalangan ahli kumpulan dan e-tutor mengenai data sekunder dan maklumat yang dikumpulkan.maklumat yang

dikumpulkan.

Kecemerlangan penyertaan dalam perbincangan data sekunder dengan ahli pasukan dan e-tutors. Penyertaan yang baik dalam perbincangan mengenai data sekunder dengan ahli pasukan dan e-tutors. Penyertaan yang sederhana dalam perbincangan data sekunder dengan ahli pasukan dan e-tutors. Kurang penyertaan dalam perbincangan data sekunder dengan ahli pasukan dan e- tutors.  

Tiada posting perbincangan.

 

Discussion on the primary data and solution based on the finding with group members & e-tutor. (CLO 2)

 

 

 

1

Excellence participation in discussion of primary data and solutions based on the finding with group members & e-tutor. Good participation in discussion of primary data and solutions based on the finding with group members & e-tutor. Moderate participation in discussion of primary data and solutions based on the finding with group members & e-tutor. Less participation in discussion of primary data and solutions based on the finding with group members & e-tutor.  

 

No posting of discussion.

 

 

 

4

 

Perbincangan mengenai data primer dan penyelesaian berdasarkan dapatan dengan ahli-ahli kumpulan & e-tutor.

  Kecemerlangan penyertaan dalam perbincangan data primer dan penyelesaian berdasarkan dapatan dengan ahli-ahli kumpulan & e-tutor. Penyertaan yang baik dalam perbincangan mengenai data primer dan penyelesaian berdasarkan dapatan dengan ahli-ahli kumpulan & e-tutor. Penyertaan yang sederhana dalam perbincangan mengenai data primer dan penyelesaian berdasarkan dapatan dengan ahli-ahli

kumpulan & e-tutor.

Kurang penyertaan dalam perbincangan data primer dan penyelesaian berdasarkan dapatan dengan ahli-ahli kumpulan & e-tutor.  

 

Tiada posting perbincangan.

 

 

Get AI-Free Expert Assignment Answers Online!

Need help with similar homework questions? Strategic Facilities Management Assignment Solution – Our experts provide hassle-free assignment answers tailored to your study needs. Trusted by students in the USA, UK, Australia, and UAE—your go-to AI-free solution for academic success!

PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE

Content Removal Request

If you are the original writer or copyright-authorized owner of this article and no longer wish to have, your work published on casestudyhelp.com, then please Request for removal of this content.

Top