{"id":5593,"date":"2020-04-26T15:17:53","date_gmt":"2020-04-26T05:17:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/casestudyhelp.com\/sample-questions\/?p=5593"},"modified":"2020-04-26T15:18:52","modified_gmt":"2020-04-26T05:18:52","slug":"2527nsc-aviation-research-methods-written-assignment-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/casestudyhelp.com\/sample-questions\/2527nsc-aviation-research-methods-written-assignment-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"2527NSC Aviation Research Methods Written Assignment Answers"},"content":{"rendered":"

2527NSC Aviation Research Methods Written Assignment 2<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n

Looking\u00a0 for 2527NSC Aviation Research Methods Written Assignment Answers<\/strong><\/a>? Improve your academic grade with Case Study Help. World’s No.1 Assignment Answers Provide on\u00a0custom research papers writing service<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0Thesis Paper Writing<\/strong><\/a> in Australia, UK, USA, Singapore and Many Countries at students friendly price.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Order-now\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I have chosen the topic Air traffic accidents and have attached the two research papers. They are Cabin Safety and emergency Evacuation<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>and<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Survivability of Occupants in commercial passenger aircraft accidents.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Written Assignment Details:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Document Type :: <\/strong>Essay (any type)<\/p>\n

Subject :: Other<\/p>\n

Deadline :*: As Per Required<\/p>\n

Number of Words :: As Per Required<\/p>\n

Citation\/Referencing Style :: APA<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Marking Criteria for 2527NSC – Written Assignment 1: Critical Analysis<\/strong><\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Content (50%)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    • Is the introduction engaging and clear?<\/li>\n
    • Does it restate the importance of the thesis?<\/li>\n
    • Is there a deep or meaningful analysis of text? (Writer\u2019s point of view is apparent)<\/li>\n
    • Is there evidence to support argument\/analysis?<\/li>\n
    • Are there connections between the text and the analysis?<\/li>\n
    • Is the analysis\/argument clear and consistent?<\/li>\n
    • Is the conclusion clear?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

       <\/p>\n

      High Distinction 5<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      • Well-developed introduction that grabs readers\u2019 attention & engages the readers<\/li>\n
      • Thesis statement clearly states the experience or event that will be described as well as the effect on the writer.<\/li>\n
      • Main points\/topic sentences are well developed and relate directly to the thesis.<\/li>\n
      • The analysis is developed with a clear and strong point of view.<\/li>\n
      • Supporting examples are logical and detailed.<\/li>\n
      • The conclusion is clear, and effectively wraps up and re-stresses the importance of the thesis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

         <\/p>\n

        Distinction 4<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        • Introduction creates interest.<\/li>\n
        • The thesis states the position.<\/li>\n
        • Main points related to the thesis, but some may lack details.<\/li>\n
        • Analysis shows events from the author\u2019s point of view but is not always consistent.<\/li>\n
        • Supporting examples are logical but missing some details<\/li>\n
        • Conclusion clearly summarises the topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

           <\/p>\n

          Credit 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          • Introduction adequately explains the background but may lack details.<\/li>\n
          • The thesis states the topic, but the key elements are missing or unclear.<\/li>\n
          • Main points are present but lack details in describing the event.<\/li>\n
          • Analysis shows events from the author\u2019s point of view but is not consistent.<\/li>\n
          • Supporting examples are sometimes unclear or not logical and missing some details.<\/li>\n
          • The conclusion summarises the topic but does not restate the importance of the thesis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

             <\/p>\n

            Pass 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            • The introduction is vague and unclear.<\/li>\n
            • Thesis somehow states the topic, but the key elements are missing or unclear.<\/li>\n
            • Ideas\/main points are not explained adequately and\/or are poorly developed.<\/li>\n
            • Little analysis is provided, or analysis is very unclear and does not show the author’s point of view.<\/li>\n
            • Background details are random, unclear collection of information<\/li>\n
            • The conclusion is not clear and does not summarise the main points.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

               <\/p>\n

              Fail 1-0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              • No introduction is provided<\/li>\n
              • The thesis does not state the topic.<\/li>\n
              • Ideas\/main points are missing or unexplained.<\/li>\n
              • No analysis is provided, or analysis is random, unclear, and show no attempt at expressing the author’s point of view.<\/li>\n
              • Background details are random, unclear collection of information<\/li>\n
              • The conclusion is unclear or missing<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                 <\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Organisation (20%)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                    \n
                  • Is the paper organised in an understandable order? (Introduction, Discussion, Conclusion?)<\/li>\n
                  • Does the paper follow formatting rules? (12 pt. font, Times New Roman)<\/li>\n
                  • Are there logical transitions between ideas and paragraphs that enhance the analysis\/argument?<\/li>\n
                  • Is this paper meeting the word count?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                     <\/p>\n

                    High Distinction 5<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    • A clear progression from the thesis, main points\/analysis, and conclusion.<\/li>\n
                    • Paper follows all formatting rules<\/li>\n
                    • Connections between paragraphs are clear and logical.<\/li>\n
                    • Word count met and stated.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                       <\/p>\n

                      Distinction 4<\/strong><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      • Thesis, main points\/analysis, and conclusion are present<\/li>\n
                      • Paper follows the formatting rules, only a few minor formatting errors.<\/li>\n
                      • Connections between paragraphs are present but sometimes are not clear or logical.<\/li>\n
                      • Word count is stated, but slightly above\/below the limit.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                         <\/p>\n

                        Credit 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        • Thesis, main points\/analysis, and conclusion are present but not clear.<\/li>\n
                        • Some formatting errors.<\/li>\n
                        • Connections between paragraphs are not always clear or logical.<\/li>\n
                        • Word count is stated, but it is significantly above\/below the limit (+\/- 200 words).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                           <\/p>\n

                          Pass 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          • Thesis, main points\/analysis, or conclusion are missing<\/li>\n
                          • Multiple formatting errors.<\/li>\n
                          • Connections between paragraphs are consistently unclear or not logical.<\/li>\n
                          • Word count is not stated or is way below\/above the limit (+\/- 300 words).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                             <\/p>\n

                            Fail 1-0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            • No order with thesis, main points\/analysis, or conclusion.<\/li>\n
                            • Paper does not follow formatting rules. Formatting errors are distracting the reader.<\/li>\n
                            • Little or no connections made between paragraphs.<\/li>\n
                            • Word count is not stated or is extremely below\/above the limit (+\/- 400 words).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                               <\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Language (20%)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                                  \n
                                • Is the paper easy to read and understand?<\/li>\n
                                • Is the paper cohesive?<\/li>\n
                                • Are grammar and vocabulary appropriate?<\/li>\n
                                • Does the paper have any grammatical or spelling mistakes?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                   <\/p>\n

                                  High Distinction 5<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  • Writing is smooth, skilful, and coherent. Paragraphs move smoothly with little or no awkward transitions.<\/li>\n
                                  • Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure.<\/li>\n
                                  • Voice is consistent, and words are well chosen.<\/li>\n
                                  • \u00a0Punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation are all correct.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                     <\/p>\n

                                    Distinction 4<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    • Writing is clear, and sentences have varied structure. Diction is consistent.<\/li>\n
                                    • Sentences are mostly expressive and well-written.<\/li>\n
                                    • Language is comprehensive and clear.<\/li>\n
                                    • Punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation are generally correct with few errors (1- 2)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                       <\/p>\n

                                      Credit 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      • Writing is clear but could use a little more sentence variety to make the writing more interesting.<\/li>\n
                                      • Some sentences are fragmented.<\/li>\n
                                      • Little descriptive language is used.<\/li>\n
                                      • There are only a few (3-4) errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                         <\/p>\n

                                        Pass 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        • Writing is somehow confusing and, in some instances, hard to follow.<\/li>\n
                                        • Contains many sentence fragments and\/or run-on sentences<\/li>\n
                                        • Language is hard to understand.<\/li>\n
                                        • Distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                           <\/p>\n

                                          Fail 1-0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                            \n
                                          • Writing is confusing and hard to follow<\/li>\n
                                          • Consistent sentence fragments and run-on sentences.<\/li>\n
                                          • Language is hard to understand or incoherent.<\/li>\n
                                          • Consistent and many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalisation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                             <\/p>\n

                                              \n
                                            1. References (10%)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                                                \n
                                              • Is this paper using the APA6 referencing style, with consistent in-text and list referencing?<\/li>\n
                                              • Is the reference list complete and with no errors?<\/li>\n
                                              • Is there more than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                 <\/p>\n

                                                High Distinction 5<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                  \n
                                                • References and citation style (APA 6) were correct and consistent between the list and the text.<\/li>\n
                                                • Reference list utterly concise without errors.<\/li>\n
                                                • Less than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                   <\/p>\n

                                                  Distinction 4<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                    \n
                                                  • References and citation style (APA 6) were correct and consistent between the list and the text.<\/li>\n
                                                  • Reference list with only a few minor mistakes (1-2).<\/li>\n
                                                  • Less than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                     <\/p>\n

                                                    Credit 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      \n
                                                    • Most of the references and citation style (APA 6) were consistent between the list and the text.<\/li>\n
                                                    • Reference list with some mistakes (3-4).<\/li>\n
                                                    • \u00a0More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                       <\/p>\n

                                                      Pass 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                        \n
                                                      • Some references and citation style (APA 6) were inconsistent between the list and the text.<\/li>\n
                                                      • Reference list has more than some mistakes (5-6).<\/li>\n
                                                      • More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                         <\/p>\n

                                                        Fail 1-0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          \n
                                                        • Many references and citation style (APA 6) were inconsistent between the text and the list.<\/li>\n
                                                        • A high number of mistakes in the reference list (6+).<\/li>\n
                                                        • More than 10% of plagiarism as per Turnitin originality report.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                                           <\/p>\n

                                                           <\/p>\n

                                                          Reference ID:\u00a0#getanswers2001177<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                           <\/p>\n