CHCPOL003 Research and Apply Evidence to Practice Assessment Solution

 

Get the Best CHCPOL003 Research and Apply Evidence to Practice – Short Answer Questions. We are a nursing assignment help service brand that can provide any kind of academic assignment help. CaseStudyHelp.com is backed by assignment writers who have obtained their degrees from prestigious international universities.

 

Assignment Brief:

• Referencing Styles: APA
• Pages: 11750
• Course Code: CHCPOL003
• Course Title: research and apply evidence to practice
• University: TAFE Queensland
• Country: AU

 

Question:

Part 1

This section consists of short answer questions.

From your experience in nursing practice, select one relevant, current issue which you think may require change or improvement.

Some examples of topic areas are provided below. You may use your own idea or select one of the examples listed below:

• Mentoring of student nurses
• Handover practices
• Wound care

Using a relevant database (e.g. CINAHL, PubMed, Google Scholar), find one (1) primary research (i.e. describing an actual study) article relating to your chosen topic area.

Ensure that the article is:

• Relevant (related to your topic area and context)
• Current (published within the last ten years)
• From a reputable source (i.e. a peer-reviewed journal)

Foolchand, D., & Maritz, J. E. (2020). Experience of nurses regarding the clinical mentoring of student nurses in resource-limited settings. Retrieved 5 May 2021, from https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/download/1434/pdf_1.

The article focuses on the main obstacles that nurse students face in the twenty-first century as they learn to work in a complex healthcare setting. It aims to investigate and describe the perspectives of experienced nurses in clinical mentoring of nursing students in low-resource settings. According to the findings of the report, students’ practice is ineffective.

Provide a rationale for why you used the database you did to find the article (consider the type of database/journals/articles; the database size; the credibility of the research).

Now read the article carefully and, using the table below as a guide, complete the relevant sections.

 

What is the research problem?

The challenges nursing students face in their education and preparation to work in various healthcare settings to ensure their suitability to practice in those settings.

 

What is the research question?

Describes the perspectives of experienced nurses that are responsible for clinical mentoring to students in a resource-constrained environment.

 

Is the research important? Why?

The study is significant because it addresses the professional mentoring of student nurses and is an important part of developing medical professionals who are well-prepared for the job. We cannot go without healthcare, and it is such an important part of everyone’s existence. As a result, it was important for the researcher to devote their attention to researching and analysing the issues that arise through the mentoring phase of student nurses that will become tomorrow’s healthcare providers. Incompetent healthcare providers result in substandard treatment, which put the patient’s safety at risk due to a variety of mistakes.

What methods were used to conduct the research?

The exploratory method was used to investigate the nursing field, another qualitative approach was used to gather evidence by face-to-face interviews, and who used the analytical approach because the data was to be collected directly from the nurses, and the analysis was conducted in an environment where nurse students’ resources and time were restricted.

What type of research is this? What are the approach and methodology?

The study is exploratory since it focused on data collection to look at the trends of nurse experience on clinical mentorship for student nurses. The research employed a mix of exploratory, analytical, and qualitative methods. Face-to-face interviews were used to gather results, which was done using qualitative methods. The information gathered was analysed thematically.

Who/what was the study sample?

The study sample was eight nurses.

 

What are the relevant cultural or ethical issues in this research?

There were no legal problems with the study, and all ethical considerations were taken into account. It is claimed that the writers had no personal or financial connections that could have influenced their decision to write the paper. It was done to learn the nurses’ perspectives on their experiences during practice and working with insufficient resources.

What are the findings of the research? Are they important?

It was discovered that mentoring was not really done. Rather, they were supervised and provided general support. Looking at the real purpose of therapeutic mentoring, this rendered the practice less successful. Lack of policy directives in the sector, inadequate personal services and supplies that render the procedure more difficult, the curriculum is typically performed informally with unclear requirements, and lack of tight supervision of the clinical mentoring phase by the relevant school management are some of the explanations provided by nurses for the practice. According to the findings, the whole procedure is still futile. The results are significant because they demonstrate how the nursing profession is declining when more untrained nurses join the workforce, wreaking havoc.

What would you do to improve this research?

I may increase the sample size of the target group of nurses by obtaining them from various institutions in order to reach a larger field of coverage and study. The research could focus on in-class assessment of nursing students to identify the many differences that occur throughout the learning process since these are likely to appear throughout the mentoring phase.

 

Part 2

In this part of the assessment, you will compare and contrast two primary research articles.

The aim of this is for you to compare and contrast the research (the topic areas are not relevant).

These articles will be reviewed; therefore, you need to upload copies of the articles with your assessment OR provide working web links.

Using the table below, compare and contrast the two (2) research articles. Provide a rationale for each section to support your answer (see the example provided).

Article 1

Is the research current?

The research is current for it was done in 2019.

Foolchand, D., & Maritz, J. E. (2020). Experience of nurses regarding the clinical mentoring of student nurses in resource-limited settings. Retrieved 5 May 2021, from https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/download/1434/pdf_1.

 

Is the research reliable?

The study is reliable because it can be used to explain why new nurses joining the industry lack quality training and skills in dealing with health issues.

 

Is the research relevant?

The study is important to nursing science since it provides further detail on nurses’ experiences with clinical mentoring to nurse students in a resource-constrained environment.

 

What are the benefits of the research?

This would support nursing students by allowing them to expand their skills. The findings would aid various organisations engaged in the preparation of student nurses in their attempts to develop qualified nurses in the future.

 

Are there any ethical considerations? What are they?

Concerning the conflict of interest, ethical decisions were made. The authors declared that no internal or external power had improperly motivated them in performing and reporting the study findings.

 

Are there any risks associated with the information?

Since the data gathering for review required face-to-face interviews, the nurses might have been unable to share the details because they doubted the exercise’s confidentiality.

 

Is the research relevant to any other disciplines? Identify which.

There was no danger involved in the data collection phase since it included designed immersive workshops for faculty and small-group learning focused on open dialogue.

 

Article 2

Is the research current?

The research is current it was done in 2018.

Osman, N. Y., & Gottlieb, B. (2018). Mentoring Across Differences | MedEdPORTAL. Mededportal.org. (2021). Retrieved 5 May 2021, from https://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10743.

 

Is the research reliable?

The research could aid in the development of an innovative mentoring network for people from various walks of life.

 

Is the research relevant?

The study is not applicable to the area of nursing research since the paper has more detail about how to carry out mentoring in different situations, focusing more on how to tutor people despite bias and gender problems.

 

What are the benefits of the research?

The research is useful because it establishes the importance of Mentroing Through Differences sessions as a critical method for dealing with diversity in the workplace. Furthermore, the study reveals how both tutor and mentee will benefit from Mentoring Through Difference sessions in order to improve their friendship and achieve positive outcomes in their mentorship programme.

 

Are there any ethical considerations? What are they?

As nothing is recorded or published in the research, no ethical concerns are made.

 

Are there any risks associated with the information?

There was no danger involved in the data collection phase since it included designed immersive workshops for faculty and small-group learning focused on open dialogue.

 

Is the research relevant to any other disciplines? Identify which.

The study focuses on Mentor Through Discrepancy (MAD) sessions, which document mentor and mentee interactions in dealing with cultural gaps, diversity, and bigotry, both of which could affect the program’s consistency. Since it is not restricted and captures all environments, the MAD can be included in any discipline.