MBA 7069 Leadership and Management Assignment Answer

Assignment Detail

• Words: 4500

Are you looking for MBA 7069 Leadership and Management MODULE GUIDE Assignment Answer? Don’t worry casestudyhelp.com provides best management case study help from high-qualified experts. We always give papers of the highest caliber. For any questions, you can get in touch with our live chat around-the-clock.

Module Description

This Module requires you to attend particular classes or events at particular times online. This module provides an opportunity to critically examine leadership and management from social, cultural, political, and economic perspectives, recognising current imperatives in the global context of contemporary business. In the module you will compare and contrast traditional and modern approaches to leadership and management, engaging with management styles and practices from different regions and cultures, and informed by a diversity of examples and case studies. You will also systematically examine and reflect on your leadership disposition, skills, and behaviours. The GAME+ attributes covered in this module are: Influence and Impact; Critical Self-Management and Skills Mastery.

The first component is aimed at critical reflection of a particular context where the learners are expected to analyse the key organisational and cultural elements in proposition of a leadership strategy. The second component focuses more on own critical reflection. The learner will be able to demonstrate a holistic impact of organisational, cultural factors along with his / her own leadership capacity followed by the developmental plan [COHERENCE and CONSOLIDATION]. The CHOICE of a recent / current scenario (C1), Personal reflection and development plan (C2) makes it CONTEMPORARY and CHALLENGING in nature.

Get Leadership Case Study Assignment help at budget friendly price

Learning Outcomes and Assessments

 

Learning Outcomes	Assessment
LO1: Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of traditional and modern approaches to leadership, management, motivation, and personal development.	Reflective Report – Coursework 3000 words
LO2:     Critically analyse and appraise different approaches to leading and managing within distinct organisational and complex cultural contexts.	Practical Presentation and Write-up – 1500 words critical piece with a 15-minute summary presentation live to class
LO3:  Systematically examine and reflect on your leadership disposition, skills, and behaviours.	Reflective Report – Coursework 3000 words
LO4:  Identify personal and professional leadership goals and devise a strategy for their attainment.	Reflective Report – Coursework 3000 words

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

LO2: Critically analyse and appraise different approaches to leading and managing within distinct organisational and complex cultural contexts.

Assessment Brief

The first assessment component is a reflective written assessment of 1500 words. You will choose one of the vignettes critically examined during the workshops and will analyse the key organisational and cultural elements of the specific context; you will propose and justify a leadership strategy appropriate to the scenario in a 15-minute live presentation to your peers.

Related Post:- MBA 7104 – Leadership and Management Module Guide

 

The write-up should be a Word document with evidence of reading and research (references). You must:

• Draw on authentic, recent / current whether global or local case-study of your own choice [CHOICE]
• Critically analyse and appraise approach (es) to leadership and management within the context of organisational and cultural context [CHALLENGE]
• Propose a suitable leadership strategy along with justification

Specific Assessment Criteria:

(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 16)

Distinction (70% and above):

The learner has identified a much relevant and contemporary vignette for examination. A comprehensive range of leadership and management approaches have been critically analysed. The organisational and cultural elements of the context have been comprehensively examined. An excellent leadership strategy has been proposed followed by strong justification and critical reflection.

Very well-crafted set of slides with exceptional delivery style, coupled with a cogent reflection and critical summary. The write-up and slide presentation demonstrate use of a wide range of current secondary research sources. Referencing, grammar and presentation style is excellent. The student makes a strong contribution to an excellent presentation. 

Merit (60-69%):

The learner has identified a quite relevant and contemporary vignette for examination. A fine range of leadership and management approaches have been critically analysed. The organisational and cultural elements of the context have been appropriately examined. A good leadership strategy has been proposed followed by fair justification and critical reflection.

Finely crafted set of slides with good delivery style, coupled with reflection and critical summary. The write-up and slide presentation demonstrate use of a sufficient range of current secondary research sources. Referencing, grammar and presentation style is good. The student makes a fair contribution to the presentation.

Pass (50-59%):

The learner has identified a somewhat relevant vignette for examination. A range of leadership and management approaches have been attempted for analysis. A few organisational and cultural elements of the context have been outlined. An acceptable leadership strategy has been proposed followed by some justification and reflection.

A satisfactory set of slides with acceptable delivery style, coupled with some reflection and summary. The write-up and slide presentation demonstrate use of a range of secondary research sources. Referencing, grammar and presentation style is satisfactory. The student makes an adequate contribution to the presentation.

Fail (49% and below):

The learner has failed to identify a relevant vignette for examination. Limited / No analysis of leadership and management approaches observed. A few / Irrelevant / No organisational and cultural elements of the context have been outlined. A poor / inappropriate / irrelevant leadership strategy has been proposed with no / poor justification and reflection.

A poorly developed set of slides with weak delivery style, lacking reflection and summary. The write-up and slide presentation demonstrate limited / no use of secondary research sources. Referencing, grammar and presentation style is inappropriate to the level. The student makes inadequate contribution to the presentation.

Students who do not meet the requirements of the Pass criteria will not successfully complete the assessment activity.

Assessment Number	2
Assessment Type (and weighting)	Reflective Report – Coursework 3000 words (70%)
Assessment Name	Reflective Report
Assessment Submission Date	28/04/2024

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

LO1: Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of traditional and modern approaches to leadership, management, motivation, and personal development.

LO3: Systematically examine and reflect on your leadership disposition, skills, and behaviours.

LO4: Identify personal and professional leadership goals and devise a strategy for their attainment. 

Assessment Brief

The second assignment component is a written report of 3000 words. You need to systematically and critically demonstrate an understanding of traditional and modern approached on leadership and Management. Based on your engagement with appropriate literature and a critical personal reflection on your leadership disposition and ambitions, you will propose a strategy for attainment of personal and professional leadership goals.

(Assignment component 1 requires you to reflect on another leader using a vignette and reflect on his / her leadership. While assignment C2 is all about your own leadership skills – [COHERENCE])

Your report should include:

• Your CV / Profile (2 pages only) outlining your current and past experiences – appropriate to cohort as course assumes all learners are current / future managers and / or leaders [COHORT]
• A critical appraisal of literature relating to leadership theories – traditional and contemporary. A reflection to own leadership style and its impact.
• A critical evaluation of your own leadership behaviour (style) and skills based on the outcomes of self-assessment instruments, theory and practice
• A synthesis of justified and creative strategies for improving your own positive leadership behaviour (style) and skills
• A Leadership Development Plan identifying how the strategies will be implemented and a critical reflection of its implementation. [CHALLENGE]

Detailed Guidance:

You should use the format specified with the headings/sub- headings indicated below. The emphasis for the assignment must be your development as a future manager/leader. The concept underpinning this assignment is that it is only when knows oneself can real development take place.

Please follow the following format:

• Records Section
• • CV / Profile

In this section you should include brief details of your work experience and qualifications in the form of a curriculum vitae (no more than 2 pages). Please note that a CV is essential.

Note: CV is not part of the word count 

• Leadership Theories and Personal Reflection

Critically appraise of literature relating to leadership theories – traditional and contemporary. A reflection to own leadership style within the context of job role and its impact should be discussed.

• Self-Assessments

You should also include in this section evidence of any self-assessment instruments, which you have used, together with evidence of seeking the views of others in regard to your skills, qualities, and general attitudes. It is expected that you will use most of the self-assessment instruments used in class (e.g. work preferences, drivers, negotiating/conflict handling style, leadership style and problem-solving style) as well as others (such as 360 degree appraisal), which you discover for yourself.

You should briefly explain what you understand by each framework and also provide an explanation and critical discussion of what your scores mean. Findings of assessments should be cross-mapped where possible.

• SWOT Analysis

A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) should be provided as a summary in bullet points clearly driven from the findings of self-assessment instruments.

• Personal Development Plan

You should generate a detailed personal development plan by identifying and prioritising four developmental objectives, based on the work carried out in the previous sections. State how you think you will achieve these (resources, timelines, review dates, evidence of achievement)

• Specific Assessment Criteria:

(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 16)

Distinction (70% and above):

The candidate provides a cohesive, comprehensive, systematic and critical understanding of multiple models and theories relating to the development of personal skills, qualities and working styles. Relationships between concepts are expertly elicited. A justified and critical evaluation of own leadership strengths and weaknesses is set out and theory expertly linked to findings. Reflections are succinct and insightful. Areas and strategies for personal development are expertly summarised, comprehensively justified and set out in a detailed leadership development plan. The submission provides an excellent set of personal development plan objectives which flows out of the analysis and personal reflection, with an excellent implementation strategy.

Extensive research demonstrating use of a wide range of contemporary and seminal sources are evident. English writing skills are excellent with clarity of expression, consistently accurate use of grammar and spelling, with fluent professional/academic writing. Referencing is clear, relevant, and consistently accurate. The submission demonstrates excellent critical analysis and in-depth reflection of personal skills, qualities and working styles using an extensive variety of models. 

Merit (60-69%):

The candidate demonstrates a sound knowledge and critical understanding of several models and comprehensively interprets appropriate concepts and theories relating to the development of personal skills, qualities and working styles. Relationships between concepts are fairly elicited. A clear and critical evaluation of your own leadership strengths and weaknesses are set out and theory linked well to findings. Areas and strategies for personal development will be well summarised, well justified and set out in a clear leadership development plan. The submission provides a good set of personal development plan objectives which flow out of the analysis and personal reflection.

Research demonstrating use of a wide range of relevant research sources are evident. Referencing and English is good.  Sources are accurately cited in the text. The work is competently presented, with standard grammar and spelling. The submission demonstrates a cohesive critique of research material resulting in a good critical analysis and in-depth reflection of personal skills, qualities and working styles using a good variety of models.

Pass (50-59%):

The candidate demonstrates an acceptable critical analysis of the leadership behaviour (styles) and skills literature along with understanding of several models and adequate critical understanding of multiple models and theories relating to the development of personal skills, qualities and working styles. Some relationship exhibited among concepts. A critical evaluation of your own leadership strengths and weaknesses is set out with theory linked to findings. Areas and strategies for personal development will be clearly summarised and justified and set out in a leadership development plan. The submission provides a generally good set of personal development plan objectives which flow out of the analysis and personal reflection.

Research demonstrating use of a range of relevant research sources are evident. Referencing and English writing is of satisfactory level.  There are relatively minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing.  The work is generally clearly presented with minor lapses in spelling and grammar. The submission demonstrates a reasonably fair critical analysis and satisfactory reflection of personal skills, qualities and working styles using a variety of models.

Fail (49% and below):

The candidate demonstrates a weak understanding of a limited range of models and theories relating to the development of personal skills, qualities and working styles. The candidate provides no / very limited referencing including some inconsistencies and inaccuracies. The work is often ambiguous, with poor grammar and spelling. The submission demonstrates limited / no critical analysis of personal skills, qualities and working styles and offers weak reflection. The submission provides a weak set of personal development plan objectives without adequate reference to the analysis carried out

Students who do not meet the requirements of the Pass criteria will not successfully complete the assessment activity.

For REF… Use:#getanswers2002625