Case Study: Project Management Assignment Solutions

Assignment Detail:-

• Topic: Project Management
• Document Type: Assignment help (any type)
• Subject: Project Management
• Number of Words: 3000
• Citation/Referencing Style: Harvard

If you are facing any problem in completing Project Management Case Study Assignment, then without any hesitation, take help from Casestudyhelp.com. We ensure you to provide management case study assignment help at affordable cost. Our experts lived up to the expectations of every student from many years. Find your free assignment solutions here!

 

CASE STUDY: King Shaka International Airport, Turner & Townsend

King Shake International Airport (KSIA) opened on 1 May 2010 in advance of the start of the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. The development took just 32 months to build and boasts a state-of-the-art passenger terminal building that handles both international and domestic passengers. It can cater to 7.5 million passengers per annum and incorporates a multi-story car park, a cargo terminal facility, a fuel farm, and fuel infrastructure, a control tower and offices, the 3,700-metre runway, and an airfield. Stakeholders in Kwa Zulu Natal had submitted many applications for the development of the airport before, but the 2010 football event acted as a catalyst for permissions being granted. The South African lead consortium – IIembe – won the project and worked with global professional services organisation, Turner & Townsend, to develop the airport.

Objectives 

The objective was to transform an area of the South African landscape into a billion- dollar greenfield airport development that could efficiently manage 7.5 million passengers each year. The project aimed to boost tourism in the area and shift the focus towards the adjacent areas for associated trade and development. Key objectives for the Ilembe project services team were to project manage the delivery teams effectively to meet deadlines, to produce accurate reports of all production activity, and to put in place people, processes, and systems to ensure technical documentation was issued on time. For Turner & Townsend, the project presented a unique opportunity to demonstrate that they have the necessary global presence to take their people, tools, and innovation and deliver the client objectives in a culturally diverse environment.

Resources 

Key people from Turner & Townsend UK visited the Ilembe consortium in early 2007 to understand the principle requirements, and to map out the required procedures, systems, and tools. Due to obvious budgetary constraints, the project team was built with as many locally employed people as possible, whilst ensuring the necessary skill transfer from the UK offices to South Africa took place. Knowledge sharing through  online meetings and the use of Turner & Townsend’s intranet system proved successful. The ability to draw on the resource and skills base from the UK was helpful yet not all UK best practices worked well for KSIA and had to be adapted to suit local project conditions. Cultural differences in the levels of planning, expectations on-site management, budget approval justification, etc, meant that certain levels of project management and controls did not fit, and therefore had to either be shelved, or adjusted to suit. A good example of this was a formal stage approval process. The UK teams found significant benefits and expectations from project clients to ensure that this procedure was rigorously applied to commencing work. The Ilembe consortium, however, was confident in other forms of phased project approval and thus the project team adapted their services to support the client’s preferred management and governance approaches.

Challenges 

In a nutshell, the challenge was simple: transform a barren area of the South African landscape into a billion-dollar green-field airport development that could efficiently manage 7.5 million passengers each year. Given the South African role as host for the FIFA Football World Cup in 2010, the project was subject to a very tight timescale for design, construction, integration, and handover to the operator. These schedule pressures, together with the constraints of an extremely competitive fixed price, lump sum EPC budget contract, all made for a remarkably challenging project. Furthermore, owing to the location of the development in an area of outstanding natural beauty in Kwa Zulu Natal, the decision from the Department of the Environment to start the development took longer than expected, which delayed the project by 77 days.

Coordination 

Faced with delays to the schedule, Turner & Townsend assisted the Ilembe team in setting in motion a plan to meet the 1 May 2010 deadline. This partly involved the formation of project clusters combining designers, builders, and cost managers to ensure a consistent understanding of the design and integration to drive the schedule. The cultural differences in updating and planning construction schedules all required time to be spent understanding the pros and cons before trying to enforce a UK- adopted approach where a local, more well-known method could be just as effective. For example, risk management concepts were very foreign in the KSIA environment,

so a less formal method was adopted. One method of controlling these interfaces was through a centrally controlled register of all critical interfaces. The register was updated and reviewed regularly with the project director who found this to be a very helpful mechanism for determining key risk areas within the schedule. Through the management of the dependency register, trends were easily identified to highlight either complex areas or poorly coordinated work faces. This facilitated bringing parties together to define, resolve, and deliver scope as a coordinated effort.

Project successes 

Turner & Townsend assisted Ilembe in delivering a full Engineer Procure Construct (EPC) contract to deliver the new airport on time and within budget with no major technical or infrastructure failings. Responsibilities within the team were clearly defined to ensure the project directors knew which member of the team was best placed to action and respond to issues. Project controls governance procedures were established early and centrally owned to update and improve meaning that consistency across all Ilembe packages was achieved, which helped standards and reporting, and minimised time wasted on reiterating requirements. Complete, auditable technical documentation and correspondence has been established to provide a complete programme record. This proved of great benefit to make information available for the close out of final accounts and in the resolution of post- completion contractual matters.

• Assume that you were the project manager for the King Shaka International Airport Clearly illustrate the process you would have engaged in to successfully manage the scope of this successful project (20)

Collect Requirements is the process of determining, documenting, and managing stakeholder needs and requirements to meet project objectives. The key benefit of this process is that it provides the basis for defining and managing the project scope including product scope. “Key people from Turner & Townsend UK visited the Ilembe consortium in early 2007 to understand the principle requirements”. Critically appraise at least FIVE (5) tools/techniques that Turner & Townsend together with the Ilembe consortium could have used to collect requirements. (20)

QUESTION TWO [15] 

Using the information in the table below, if the project team will work a standard working week (5 working days in 1 week) and that all tasks will start as soon as possible:

• Determine the critical path of the (8)
• Calculate the planned duration of the project in (4)
• Identify any non-critical tasks and the float (free slack) on (3)

 

QUESTION THREE [15] 

Tabulate a risk assessment for the school building project by identifying five (5) risks of your choice, analyse each risk in terms of the likelihood of it occurring and the severity of impact, and provide a risk response to each risk. For the analysis of risk, you can show the matrix used to assess the likelihood and severity.